Skip to main content
Juliana Adjem Anchang

Cameroon

Juliana Adjem Anchang Member since 28/07/2019

Group for Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Consulting

Lead Consultant
Website
I have worked with the Pan African Institute for Development – West Africa (PAID –WA) from 2008 to 2019. I have ten years progressive experience diligently serving monitoring and evaluation tasks including baseline surveys, needs assessments and qualitative studies; With extensive skills from working with international and domestic agencies including private donors: Planning, implementing, monitoring, evaluating and measuring impact of projects and programs; conducting surveys and operations research; developing information systems to best measure and document program/project outputs and effectiveness to inform strategic development. Demonstrated technical inputs in implementing day-to-day program operations, in project financial planning and reporting, and in partner and donor relationships. I have advanced skills in statistical methods, data collection, data interpretation and presentation. Ability to forge and maintain relationships with partner organizations as well as building capacity within local partners of all levels.

My contributions

    • Juliana Adjem Anchang

      Cameroon

      Juliana Adjem Anchang

      Lead Consultant

      Group for Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Consulting

      Posted on 28/10/2026

      My engagements with development and humanitarian organizations, and especially local civil society organizations, suggest that as financial resources decline, there is a growing risk that M&E will be deprioritized, particularly where its value for organizational learning and strategic decision-making has not been sufficiently institutionalized. Several evaluations are donor requirements, but when not donor-driven, efforts in evidence generation for decision-making are often centered on project achievements and success stories rather than systematically generated evidence. While this does not necessarily imply that evaluations are not conducted, it raises concerns about how evidence is documented, retained, and used. In resource-constrained environments, excluding such evidence risks repeating ineffective approaches, misallocating scarce resources, weakening accountability to communities, and missing opportunities for program adaptation and improvement.