I have been working as an expert in programme evaluation and management. I have carried out many projects and programme evaluation related to livelihoods enhancement, economic development, natural resources management, climate change, disaster risk reduction and sustainable development in Nepal and other South Asian countries. Currently, I am serving as a president of community of evaluators in Nepal and am also engaged in evaluation field building while working with the government of Nepal.
Posted on 13/03/2024
I have not used in evaluation per se but used for literature review and other purposes. I am aware this will be a useful tool but not sure whether the information available or used by chat gpt is adequately represent the context and information for the developing countries like Nepal. I do hope - colleagues who have used the tool will be in position to share their experience.
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 26/04/2025
Thank you all for the rich and diverse insights that contributed to the discussion on the effectiveness of large-scale development projects. The collective reflections underscore that while project size can influence outcomes, it is not the sole determinant of success. Key factors such as contextual relevance, governance structures, community engagement, and adaptive capacity play pivotal roles.
The following are the major points from this discussion.
Structural limitations of big projects
Several participants highlighted inherent challenges common to large projects. For example, Lila critiques overambitious theories of change and limited local engagement, emphasizing the disconnect between intentions (e.g., food security) and unrealistic activities (e.g., one-day training). In his detailed analysis, Prof. Tinsley points to high transaction costs caused by multilayered management, where administrative overheads dilute resources intended for beneficiaries.
Serdar notes the lack of genuine community participation, with consultations often confined to the inception phase—undermining co-design. Divya brings in an equity lens, warning of elite capture and misaligned funding, where power dynamics can silence local voices. Shriniwas raises concerns over potential governance failures, such as poor coordination in overly complex project designs that prioritize donor visibility over lasting impact.
2. Large Interventions can also succeed under specific conditions
Some contributors shared examples of large projects succeeding when well-integrated, purpose-driven, and contextually grounded. Pramel cites India’s high-density, locally focused investments as successful cases. Similarly, Serdar commends Afghanistan’s FAO-led irrigation program for blending infrastructure development with capacity building and environmental benefits. Eddah notes that large projects tend to perform well in infrastructure and humanitarian contexts but face limitations in sectors like health and agriculture, where smaller, targeted initiatives often prove more effective.
3. For the success of the intervention, consideration of context, sustainability, and knowledge continuity is key
Several scholars stressed the importance of contextual alignment, cultural fit, flexible monitoring, and local capacity development to ensure the successful interventions. For example, Zhiqi highlights the role of cultural embeddedness and behavioral resonance by contrasting the success of microfinance in Bangladesh (community-driven) with its failure in China (top-down). Ojha advocates for participatory monitoring to reflect local dynamics and cautions against rigid, globally imposed frameworks.
Others pointed out systemic gaps that hinder effectiveness. Anna Maria argues that a skilled and grounded team can often outweigh the benefits of scale, as small projects can deliver outsized impact. Charles warns of knowledge discontinuity in large projects due to reliance on short-term consultants, which weakens institutional memory. Hailu emphasizes the need for iterative learning to navigate complex environments, regardless of project size. Imtiaz highlights the key factors affecting the project's success, such as good management approaches and an understanding of the project's complexities.
The consensus is that scale alone does not determine success or failure.
However, large projects tend to face recurring structural challenges. The discussion highlights that scale can be leveraged more effectively through co-design (with strong local integration), contextualised interventions rooted in local realities, and investment in local systems that prioritize capacity building and downward accountability. Ultimately, project effectiveness depends on purposeful design, equitable governance, and adaptive learning, not merely the size of the budget. To move beyond the binary of ‘big’ vs ‘small,’ we must instead ask how and for whom the project is implemented.
A comprehensive summary of this discussion will be made available shortly. It will be accessible in English, Spanish, and French. Please check back soon for updates.
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 16/04/2025
Dear Dr Ojha
Thank you for sharing such a rich and grounded reflection based on your long experience in this field. Your insights resonate deeply with what I have observed in many large-scale initiatives. The tendency to adopt global frameworks with minimal contextual adaptation indeed undermines effectiveness and ownership. When projects are too rigid and centrally driven, they miss the opportunity to respond to local dynamics, community needs, and shifting contexts—critical for achieving inclusive and sustainable outcomes.
I particularly appreciate your emphasis on enhancing M&E systems. Relying solely on standardized, top-down indicators often masks the underlying reasons behind a project’s success or failure. In my experience, participatory and mixed-methods approaches—especially those that co-create indicators with stakeholders—help not only in generating more relevant data but also in fostering trust and ownership. For instance, in a recent climate adaptation project, integrating storytelling and community mapping into M&E uncovered power dynamics and localized impacts that a purely quantitative approach would have missed. Thank you for raising these important points—your experience adds great value to this ongoing conversation. Best regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 15/04/2025
Dear Hailu,
Thank you for your thoughtful reflections. I agree that complexity, uncertainty, and evolving external conditions make managing megaprojects particularly challenging. In my experience, flexibility and iterative learning, when embedded into design and implementation, can greatly enhance resilience and effectiveness. These principles are indeed applicable across all long-term initiatives, regardless of budget size. Best regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 13/04/2025
Dear Eddah,
Thank you for your insightful contribution. I truly appreciate how clearly you've distinguished the contextual effectiveness of large versus small projects, supported by relevant sectoral examples. Your reflection reinforces a key learning from our ongoing discussion: the effectiveness of a project—whether large or small—must align with its purpose, context, and implementation approach.
Indeed, large-scale interventions have proven highly impactful in infrastructure and emergency response due to their need for rapid, coordinated, and resource-intensive actions. Yet, as you’ve rightly pointed out, in areas like health, agriculture, and social development, small, locally anchored projects often outperform in terms of sustainability, relevance, and community ownership.
This highlights an important takeaway: the question isn’t whether big or small is better, but rather what fits best for the objective and context at hand. Balancing scale with local adaptability, and complementing large projects with locally driven initiatives, could offer a more holistic pathway to long-lasting change. Looking forward to hearing more from your rich experience.
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 13/04/2025
Dear Serdar
Thank you for your rich and well-articulated reflections. Your example, particularly the FAO irrigation program in Afghanistan, illustrates how well-resourced, large-scale initiatives can deliver systemic outcomes—from infrastructure development to capacity building and environmental gains—offering important lessons for the community.
At the same time, as you also noted, large-scale projects can face challenges. In my experience, expansive geographic and thematic scopes, combined with bureaucratic layers, frequently dilute meaningful community engagement. In many cases, consultations are limited to the project inception phase only, leaving little space for co-design or early feedback on the project design.
The key takeaway is the need to balance scale with participation—recognizing both the opportunities and inherent limitations of large projects to ensure long-term effectiveness and local ownership.
Best regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 10/04/2025
Dear Pramel,
Thank you for sharing your insightful reflections from the Indian context.
It’s encouraging to hear how high investment density, coupled with integrated-specific design, can drive meaningful on-ground impact. Your example reinforces an important lesson for large-scale interventions: that focus, local relevance, and systems thinking are critical to achieving both effectiveness and sustainability.
There is great value for the community of practice in learning from such practical experiences. If possible, it would be helpful to hear more from you—particularly any comparative insights on how project size influences adaptability, local ownership, and transaction costs across different contexts. Best regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 09/04/2025
Dear Prof. Tinsley,
It’s a pleasure to reconnect after so many years (ref: AIT/AASP/1998), and thank you for your thoughtful observation. Indeed, in South Asia—particularly Nepal—I’ve observed that larger projects often involve multiple layers of management, including international experts with high overheads, which can significantly raise transaction costs across global, national, and local levels. While donors may perceive large projects as more cost-efficient at the administrative level, the actual value reaching beneficiaries can be diluted. Given your extensive experience, I’d be very interested to know if you’ve come across studies that analyze the proportion of funds utilized by service providers versus those reaching intended beneficiaries. Best regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 08/04/2025
Dear Lila,
Thank you for your insightful reflection. You’ve highlighted important issues in development programming—overly ambitious theories of change (ToC) that lack realistic pathways to impact. Linking complex outcomes like food security to limited activities, such as a one-day training, underscores the gap between intention and implementation. I feel, this is often due to a weak or missing theory of action, which should detail how activities translate into outcomes within specific contexts.
Your observation on the limited involvement of local communities in program design and delivery is equally important. Without meaningful engagement, interventions risk being misaligned with real needs and may fail to gain local ownership—critical for sustainability. I also appreciate your use of the Sanskrit fable, which reflects the dynamics between donors, implementers, and evaluators.
Given your wealth of experience across Africa and Asia, I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on how these challenges play out differently—or similarly—across contexts, and whether smaller, community-led initiatives have managed to overcome some of the structural limitations of large-scale projects. Looking forward to your insights.
Warm regards,
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 31/03/2025
Big projects are designed to create a large-scale impact, but do they always deliver value for money? In your experience, do they effectively translate funds into meaningful, lasting change for food security, agriculture, and rural development? Or do they struggle with inefficiencies, rigid structures, and limited local ownership? Let’s start by reflecting on whether these large investments are truly justified. What has your evaluation work revealed? Your experience matters.
Nepal
Ram Khanal
Advisor
Community of Evaluator (COE) Nepal
Posted on 22/04/2025